A BOUNTY!
by GypsyRN on Mar.27, 2012, under Democrats
At this point in time I have noticed that no one, that is no one from the Justice Department, police or anyone has stepped up and tell the new black panther party to get rid of their one million dollar bounty on George Zimmerman. I was listening to the news and listened to the ravings of one of the black panthers going on and on about getting justice through the legal system or through themselves. There was an implied threat to take the matter into their own hands if they do not get satisfaction from the legal community.
I was shocked when I heard the offer of a bounty, I hope others were also, this is a bounty on someone that has not been charged with a crime! We are innocent until proven guilty. There has been no Grand Jury hearings, no indictment, the investigation is still going forward. The very idea that a bounty is being collected for a person not charged with a crime is shocking to say the least. This is akin to a lynch mob calling for the hanging of someone not deemed to have been guilty of any crime. What is the difference here? They are threatening to take “justice” into their own hands.
Not only has the Justice Department not spoken out, no one in the news has either. This is really shocking! I can’t imagine the apoplectic response if a white group put out a bounty on some one that had not been charged with a crime. I don’t understand why everyone is so mum on this call for a bounty! This is anarchy by the black panthers. This should be spoken out against at the highest levels of law enforcement. I have not even seen the Hispanic community come out and confront anyone about the bounty. I know if someone put a bounty on a black man, not charged with a crime the country would go postal! It is not doing that now, people seem very quiet about this problem. The black panthers are offering 1 million dollars for information leading to the capture of Geroge Zimmerman, a man not charged with any crime at the moment.
I am not diminishing the fact that a young man was killed. I am saying that until all the facts are in, the grand jury hears the evidence and either gives a true bill or not and this is taken before a jury and George Zimmerman is given a fair trial calling for threats against his life are wrong! This is not the way our justice system is supposed to work. We are given an opportunity to have a fair trial and be judged by our peers. George Zimmerman is not guilty in the sight of the law for any crime until such time a jury renders a verdict. So black panthers take your bounty and your racial hated somewhere else.
Killing Rush Limbaugh!
by GypsyRN on Mar.22, 2012, under Conservatives
I was on facebook and found this curious video calling for the killing of Rush Limbaugh. I find it absolutely astounding that the left can call women anything they want, the C-word to whatever, and get away with it. The likes of misogynists, Bill Mahra and David Letterman have an ongoing verbal fusillade of degrading remarks towards conservative women and their children, as in Palin’s daughter, who was mockingly described as being raped at a sporting even ,described by David Letterman in his monolog ! Oh he did apologize, that was all it took, it was over as far as the left was concerned. Then the likes of Ed Schultz on MSNBC called Laura Ingraham a talk show slut! That again was apologized for, Schultz was suspended for a period of time, then back at the microphone.
What is uniquely interesting is that when all those events happened no one from the right called for them to be taken off the air, boycotted or any thing else other then being apologetic. Though the voracity of the apology may be in question, most did apologize. Now when Rush comes out and calls Sandra Fluke a slut all hell breaks loose. He does apologize on air for his remark. There is an outrage like never before from the left. They use the same or worse adjectives to describe women and now they are outraged!!? I think not! They are not outraged, they want to call for boycotts, banning and videos that call for Killing Rush Limbaugh. I would love to see what would happen if a video was released calling for the Killing of Bill Mahar or David Letterman, Sandra Fluke or some other left wing radical.
I know what would happen, the outpouring of finger pointing would reach an apoplectic pitch. It would be all over the left wing media front and center. The left fears reason and logic. They can not argue points based on logic and reason so they attempt to kill the messenger. Why has left wing talk radio never taken off? because no one listens to it, it is based on hyperbole and feelings! They deal with the feelings the right deals with the logic of the argument. So what they fear they want to silence, they can’t win in the talk arena, so they silence the opponent. There is no free speech to the left other then their speech, anything else is to be feared and eradicated. The left has been wanting to silence the conservative talk shows for years, now media matters’ Jeff Brock is stepping up to the plate to take a swing! In the end he will strike out! The difference between the left and the right is the right encourages free dialogue, freedom of speech and the right to disagree. We have come to a point where the radical left is reaching out to cause physical harm to those who disagree, silencing dissenters is the only action they know.
Rush Limbaugh! off Armed Forces Network! ?
by GypsyRN on Mar.06, 2012, under Conservatives
Brent Bozelle I stand with Rush
I was reading on FB and came across a site hosted by Brent Bozelle, head of the MRC,the Media Research Center. He has a site supporting Rush Limbaugh with links and numbers to his sponsors. I found also, the link and phone number to the White House White House. They currently are running a petition to have Rush Limbaugh removed from AFN (armed forces network). They currently have 13000 + signatures. The white house with it’s tax funded website is using my tax dollars to sponsor a petition to have Rush removed from AFN! You can call the While House 1 202 456 1111 that is the line for comments, tell them to remove it!
This is the moment the regime has been waiting for, they now are trying to take conservative talk radio off of AFN. Rush has been a thorn in the side of this administration for some time and now they want to have him removed for his comments regarding the Ms. Fluke. Rush made an on air apology, of course that was or is not enough according to the left. I never saw an outpouring against Keith Olbermann, Bill Mahar, or Ed aka Sgt Schultz for their remarks. When Ed Schultz apologized that was enough. Apologies are accepted when they are from the left only. Bill Mahar is one of the biggest misogynists in the media. You never hear anyone calling for a boycott….he is on HBO! As Rush said he fell into the trap of the left. As a conservative his apology is not enough, not sincere enough, not heart felt enough.
The left wants to quiet its opponents. They fear them so much they have to quiet them, attack them, marginalize them, silence them. Be certain, the regime is out to since anyone that drifts from it’s path or ideals. This is how regimes operate, they silence their opposition. They can not logically argue with them so they silence them.
ED Schultz calling Laura Ingraham a SLUT!
by GypsyRN on Mar.05, 2012, under Uncategorized
Here is the illustrious Sgt. Schultz calling conservative talk show host, Laura Ingraham a slut on MSNBC. Where is the outrage there? Please!
Rush Limbaugh on Sandra Fluke!
by GypsyRN on Mar.02, 2012, under Conservatives
The third-year Georgetown University law student, Sandra Fluke, received a supportive phone call from Obama, and was backed by members of Congress, women’s groups, and the administration and faculty at her Roman Catholic university. If you look at her Ms. Fluke’s history she went to Georgetown U. with the expressed purpose of exposing the contraception angle. She new full well that GU did not have contraceptive coverage in their health care, being a Catholic University, that would not happen. She had an agenda concerning contraception even before she even applied and was accepted as a student. She went with the expressed plan of doing what she has done, attempting to make a mockery of GU.
She attended the hearing,being the only witness to testify. She brought up the problem of paying for her personal contraceptives, saying it would cost $3700.00 a year, she did not have that kind of money. She wanted to expose GU for not having contraceptive aids available to her. Planned Parenthood can be visited and the procurement of contraceptives can be done quite easily and had a minimal cost or even free. She chose not to take that approach, she basically said she was a victim in this situation. That somehow because she could not afford birth control someone ought to pay for it for her! Her attitude was one of disdain and anger at GU. Somehow she never was able to put it together that if she did not have the money for BC then she should not have been “screwing” anyone with a pulse. Where did she get that idea that someone else is responsible to supply her with BC? I can guess it was the liberal(s). She some how had the “right” to BC and that someone was to pay if she could not! That is total nonsense.
My statement to her would be the same as Rush! you really need to rein in your sexual activities if you can not pay for the BC. I suppose Sandra you were there to study law? I have heard how busy law students are, I am wondering how you could possibly make time for so much promiscuous sexual behavior, did you not study? or did you study on your back? Sandra you have more problems then just being a slut! You engage in behavior that could also transmit STD’s and other transmittable diseases. Somewhere along the line you really went off the deep end. Make it clear, it is not anyone else’s job to pay for your BC, it is YOU. If you can’t afford it, do not engage in those behaviors. Pretty simple, even a law student can get it! Plain and simple, you set yourself up for this; I hope you enjoy the laughing stock you made of yourself…! You can only blame one person, YOU!
Rest in Peace….Andrew Breitbart, Journalist!
by GypsyRN on Mar.01, 2012, under Conservatives
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/
You will be sorely missed Andrew…you fought the long and hard fight…rest well…!
Rest in peace, Davy Jones….!
by GypsyRN on Feb.29, 2012, under Uncategorized
That is so sad he was the cutest one of the whole group every girl,nearly, wanted to marry him!…RIP! I still have videos and music of the The Monkees’ great stuff….timeless!
Rick Santelli knows what is wrong with the jobs numbers!
by GypsyRN on Feb.04, 2012, under Conservatives
Listen to Rick Santelli clarify the jobs numbers.
Anti Dog Eat Dog! or Resonable Profits Board!
by GypsyRN on Jan.20, 2012, under Democrats
Six House Democrats, led by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), want to set up a “Reasonable Profits Board” to control gas profits.
The Democrats, worried about higher gas prices, want to set up a board that would apply a “windfall profit tax” as high as 100 percent on the sale of oil and gas, according to their legislation. The bill provides no specific guidance for how the board would determine what constitutes a reasonable profit.The Gas Price Spike Act, H.R. 3784, would apply a windfall tax on the sale of oil and gas that ranges from 50 percent to 100 percent on all surplus earnings exceeding “a reasonable profit.” It would set up a Reasonable Profits Board made up of three presidential nominees that will serve three-year terms. Unlike other bills setting up advisory boards, the Reasonable Profits Board would not be made up of any nominees from Congress. …
According to the bill, a windfall tax of 50 percent would be applied when the sale of oil or gas leads to a profit of between 100 percent and 102 percent of a reasonable profit. The windfall tax would jump to 75 percent when the profit is between 102 and 105 percent of a reasonable profit, and above that, the windfall tax would be 100 percent. The bill also specifies that the oil-and-gas companies, as the seller, would have to pay this tax.
__________________________________________________________________________
For those of you who have read “Atlas Shrugged” by Ayn Rand this bill has eerie similarities to the Equalization of Opportunity bill that was introduced in her novel. Another way that government attempts to control what people and corporations make. It was supposed to level the playing field so no one got ahead or made more then someone else. This new reasonable profits board is suggested to be set up with Presidential appointees, not confirmed by congressional hearings! This is right out of Atlas Shrugged, most interesting that Ayn Rand had this ability to play it forward to the present day. She is a real visionary.
This was gleaned from Hotair.com. There is a complete run down by Michelle Malkin in her blog. Here was going again, the government trying to take more and more freedom from the citizens. This is what Ayn Rand wrote about, the loss of personal freedom, degradation of capitalism and the progressives moving towards socialism. If this does not send chills up your spine then something is very wrong! This kind of government action is just another attempt to usurp our freedom and our way of life in this capitalistic society.
